Just War Theory, rooted in moral philosophy, seeks to provide a framework for evaluating the justifications for engaging in warfare. However, it has faced numerous criticisms over time, questioning its principles and practical applications. The relevance of these criticisms in…
The Just War Theory has undergone significant evolution in the modern era, adapting to the complexities of contemporary warfare. Its fundamental principles continue to inform ethical considerations in state-led and multilateral conflicts, raising essential questions about justice and legitimacy in…
The ethics of engaging in war is a complex and multifaceted issue, often framed within the context of Just War Theory. This philosophical framework seeks to provide a moral foundation for determining the justification of armed conflict, balancing ethical considerations…
Noncombatant immunity represents a cornerstone of ethical discourse within Just War Theory, establishing a critical boundary between combatants and civilians during armed conflict. This principle demands that efforts be made to protect innocent lives, emphasizing the moral obligation to avoid…
Discrimination in Just War is a fundamental principle within Just War Theory, which aims to delineate acceptable conduct during armed conflict. This theory emphasizes the ethical distinction between combatants and non-combatants, seeking to limit harm to civilians while ensuring the…
The last resort principle emerges as a vital tenet within Just War Theory, advocating that armed conflict should only occur after all non-violent alternatives have been exhausted. This principle is grounded in an ethical framework that prioritizes diplomacy and peaceful…
Proportionality in conflict is a fundamental principle that guides ethical conduct during warfare, ensuring that military actions do not exceed what is necessary to achieve legitimate objectives. It serves as a pivotal criterion in assessing the moral justification of violence…
The concept of the probability of success holds significant importance in the context of warfare, particularly when examined through the lens of Just War Theory. Understanding this probability aids military strategists in determining the justification and viability of engaging in…
The concept of the “right intention for war” is paramount in evaluating the moral legitimacy of armed conflict. It invites us to question not just the reasons behind warfare, but the ethical framework guiding these decisions. Incorporating the principles of…
In the discourse of warfare, the concept of legitimate authority underpins the ethical justifications for both engaging in and conducting armed conflict. Embedded within Just War Theory, legitimate authority serves as a critical determinant of the moral legitimacy of military…